Just beginning this Wikipedia thing has been entertaining - while reading the page about Wikipedia itself, I followed the "portmanteau" link and learned all sorts of fascinating things about the use of that term for a new word made by combining two others. We can thank Lewis Carroll for this usage - he borrowed the concept of a two-compartment suitcase to describe such created words.
And the fun continues, here is a great cartoon about wikipedia. Everybody loves to laugh at wikipedia, until their assignment is due.
background
Showing posts with label wiki. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wiki. Show all posts
Thursday, 1 April 2010
Wiki work
I visited the Oxford Web 2.0 wiki and had a look at the Law Library page under Case Studies. I was happy to find a little bit of work to do - our page had no mention our Facebook presence, so I added an entry for it with a link to the actual page. I need to return and add some information about how we use Facebook, but it's a start.
I will admit here to being a bit of a wiki sceptic - the concept is great, getting everyone to participate and contribute to a central repository of knowledge, but I find that in practice, if you don't have a very focused and energetic group of contributors, wikis can sort of languish, never reaching their full potential.
That said, I love wikipedia, with the obvious caveats about accuracy. If you are just looking for a general idea about something, with a high probability of input from someone who knows what they're talking about, wikipedia is your friend. I imagine that if you are a high profile, controversial public figure, wikipedia might seem like your worst enemy.
I will admit here to being a bit of a wiki sceptic - the concept is great, getting everyone to participate and contribute to a central repository of knowledge, but I find that in practice, if you don't have a very focused and energetic group of contributors, wikis can sort of languish, never reaching their full potential.
That said, I love wikipedia, with the obvious caveats about accuracy. If you are just looking for a general idea about something, with a high probability of input from someone who knows what they're talking about, wikipedia is your friend. I imagine that if you are a high profile, controversial public figure, wikipedia might seem like your worst enemy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)